Bad Buildings Destroy Good Cities

There is a lot of attention given to the planning and zoning side of cites: density, configuration, use-mix, etc. While this is important, it almost always neglects the building stock itself. While there are places like
My concern is this: Many of these “urban” places I see springing up (whether economically and functionally urban or not,) are only skin deep. Living densely requires a whole different mindset than their initiators will admit. Noise, odor, vibration, and security require thick construction when people are packed together (especially in these days of the subwoofer.) Large projects cannot be maintained and renovated piecemeal like houses and garden apartments, so they must be built with a longer service life to stay viable for more than a few years. Cheaply built “urbanism” today will become an absolutely horrible place to be if its’ paper-thin walls begin to fall apart in a few years, and a single larger project gone bad can blight an entire sector of the city. I fear if the general public is sold a bill of goods masquerading as a dense city, without the infrastructure and housing stock that made real places like
Beauty is more than skin deep; you can hear and feel it too.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home